Одну секунду
Что-то сучилось. Попробуйте еще раз.
Vox смотреть последние обновления за сегодня на .
The way scripted television gets made today has transformed the careers of writers. Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 Thousands of television and film writers who are part of the Writers Guild of America are in the middle of a historic strike. They're forming picket lines in front of studios, and productions in New York and Los Angeles and shutting down active sets. The last time they went on strike was 15 years ago — when streaming’s impact on the film and television industry was only just taking shape. This time around, they are striking for better residuals and rights against the looming threat of AI, among other concerns. A t the core of this dispute is streaming and how it's revolutionized the industry. Companies like Netflix, Hulu, Apple TV+, and more have given consumers an unprecedented array of films and TV shows and opened the door to new voices that don’t have to adhere to mainstream network formats. On the other hand, streaming has also changed how television gets produced, the role writers play, and how they get paid. We interviewed four television writers and showrunners about how streaming has changed how they work, how their incomes have taken a hit, and why it has become harder than ever to build a career. Further reading: The New Yorker interviewed The Bear writer Alex O’Keefe that Julia Yorks mentions in the video: 🤍 Alissa Wilkinson covered the WGA strike for Vox, including a part of it we don’t mention in this video: the threat of AI: 🤍 There’s a great episode of The Daily about how streaming stunts career development for TV writers: 🤍 Vox is an explanatory newsroom on a mission to help everyone understand our weird, wonderful, complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. Part of that mission is keeping our work free. You can help us do that by making a gift: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍 Check out our articles: 🤍 Listen to our podcasts: 🤍
Because of them, Sudan is at risk of falling into a civil war Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 On December 19, 2018, protests broke out in small cities throughout Sudan amid an economic crisis, eventually reaching the country's capital, Khartoum. These protests posed the biggest challenge to Sudan's longest-serving dictator, Omar al-Bashir, who throughout his regime did everything he could to remain in power. Bashir relied on various security sectors to protect him from being overthrown. However, his plan ultimately failed on April 11, 2019, when the country's army, the Sudanese Armed Forces, and a paramilitary force, the Rapid Support Forces, sided with the protesters and carried out a military coup, toppling Bashir. The end of Bashir's regime brought hope to the protesters, but they remained skeptical about the men who had overthrown him. SAF’s Abdel Fattah Burhan and RSF’s Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo (aka Hemeti) took control of the country after the coup and made repeated promises to hand over power to civilians, which would put Sudan on a democratic path. But they continuously delayed fulfilling their promises and instead turned against each other, vying for power in Sudan. The two men have brutally interrupted Sudan’s pro-democracy revolution. Watch the latest episode of Atlas to understand how their feud has undermined the democratic aspirations of the protesters and put Sudan at risk of a civil war. Sources and additional reading: This Q&A by the New Yorker featuring Mai Hassan helped us understand Omar al-Bashir’s coup-proofing agenda - 🤍 This article by Mat Nashed was a great starting point for us to learn more about the recent conflict- 🤍 Local reporting by Radio Dabanga kept us up-to-date with the day to day of the conflict - 🤍 This paper by Global Witness provided us with information on how the RSF became wealthy 🤍 We found the International Crisis Group’s in depth reporting analyses and commentary very useful throughout our reporting and research - 🤍 Keeping up with Ism’ail Kushkush’s and Yousra Elbagir’s reporting throughout the revolution helped us understand the lead up towards Burhan’s and Hemeti’s rivalry - 🤍 🤍 Vox is an explanatory newsroom on a mission to help everyone understand our weird, wonderful, complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. Part of that mission is keeping our work free. You can help us do that by making a gift: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍 Check out our articles: 🤍 Listen to our podcasts: 🤍
Punching in movies, explained by someone getting punched repeatedly. Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 Movie fight scenes at their best are spectacular, visceral, and impactful. Films like Creed, John Wick, and Bullet Train have scenes that make you feel every punch. But not all fight scenes are created equal. We’ve all seen scenes that rely on quick cuts to conceal the absence of actual physical contact, or scenes that just don’t land. Crafting a fight that immerses the audience and makes them feel like they’re in the midst of the action requires a delicate dance between choreography, the work of stunt performers, strategic camera angles, immersive sound effects, and, above all, a compelling story. Most of the time, actors and stuntmen aren’t really hitting each other. So how do they make it feel realistic? In Vox’s latest, stunt coordinator and second unit director Wade Eastwood breaks down the artistry behind creating on-screen battles that leave a lasting impact on viewers, even when the punches aren’t real. Note: The headline on this piece has been updated. Previous headline: How to fake a punch like movie stars Vox is an explanatory newsroom on a mission to help everyone understand our weird, wonderful, complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. Part of that mission is keeping our work free. You can help us do that by making a gift: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍 Check out our articles: 🤍 Listen to our podcasts: 🤍
And why that’s a big deal. Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 For the first time in six decades, China’s population is shrinking, and it’s predicted it could create a demographic crisis. That’s because China isn’t just shrinking, it’s also aging. And the majority of Chinese couples are not considering having more than one child. Because of this, China is predicted to lose nearly 50 percent of its population by 2100. China’s population decline can be traced back to the restrictive family-planning policies launched in the 1970s and an impressive economic boom fueled by China’s huge labor force. China’s modernization brought rapid urbanization, rising income levels, and better education to large parts of China. Combined, these policies and growth have given China one of the lowest birth rates in the world. Today, China is trying to reverse its population decline. Not just because an aging population is hard to sustain economically, but because China’s impressive economic growth, until now, has relied on its people. As China’s population challenges deepen over time, it might have to rethink how to grow its economy and care for its citizens. You can explore China’s birth and death rate data via the United Nations Population portal, here: 🤍 🤍 As well as the country’s total population and predictions here: 🤍 Here are some key facts about China’s declining population from Pew Research: 🤍 You can read some surprising details about China’s family planning policies — for example, the One-Child Policy was actually less impactful than the Later, Longer, Fewer campaign — here: 🤍 Here’s an overview of China’s economic development from the World Bank: 🤍 And a report on China’s income gap: 🤍 For an in-depth look at the cruelty and human cost of China’s One-Child policy, I recommend the documentary One Child Nation by Nanfu Wang: 🤍 You can explore population pyramids from across the world on the US Census Bureau’s website: 🤍 Finally, our expert, Professor Wang Feng, believes China’s population growth can be framed in a positive light. To understand how, read this piece he wrote for the New York Times: 🤍 Make sure you never miss behind the scenes content in the Vox Video newsletter, sign up here: 🤍 Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out 🤍 Support Vox's reporting with a one-time or recurring contribution: 🤍 Shop the Vox merch store: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on Facebook: 🤍 Follow Vox on Twitter: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍
From clothes to tech, why is everything so poorly made? Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 Maybe you’ve noticed: In the past 10 years everything we buy from clothes to technology has gotten just a little bit worse. Sweaters are more likely to tear. Phones are more likely to break. Smart toasters and TVs burn out and die after only a few years. It might seem like consumer products just aren’t built to last anymore. What’s going on? Unfortunately (and fortunately!), part of the problem is us. For decades, we’ve been conditioned to buy, buy, buy, and today it’s normal for many consumers to shop for new clothes at least once a month. In order to keep up, many companies have to prioritize making things in the fastest and least expensive way possible. To do that, they cut corners with materials and labor. In turn, quality suffers, which leaves consumers with a lot of crappy things. The story with technology is a little different. And the biggest difference is that while no one in fashion is saying you’re not allowed to sew a new button on a shirt, many tech companies have actually made it impossible to repair their products. The good news is consumers have a surprising amount of control over this situation. Watch the video to learn more. Check out the original article from Izzie Ramirez on Vox.com: 🤍 Repair.org is Gay Gordon Byrne’s association that’s fighting for your right to repair. For more on the right to repair bill in New York State there are some articles here: 🤍 🤍 While I didn’t spend much time on Fast Fashion for this piece, I did love these articles: 🤍 🤍 This article from Vogue did a great job breaking down what things actually costs: 🤍 I also highly recommend following Cora Harrington (🤍lingerie_addict) and Derek Guy (🤍dieworkwear) on twitter for more hot takes on the fashion industry. Make sure you never miss behind the scenes content in the Vox Video newsletter, sign up here: 🤍 Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out 🤍 Support Vox's reporting with a one-time or recurring contribution: 🤍 Shop the Vox merch store: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on Facebook: 🤍 Follow Vox on Twitter: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍
What jobs do 15-year-olds expect to do at 30? Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 Every few years, thousands of teenagers are asked a very simple question: What job do you expect to have when you're 30? It's an important question because having an answer helps teenagers plan for the future, whether that's taking a specific class or deciding whether to attend college. That's why the OECD's PISA survey has asked this question since 2000. But in the last 20 years, we've seen a concerning trend: More and more teenagers name the same basic jobs, like doctor or lawyer, almost as if they're picking jobs out of a children's book. And even more worrisome is that more and more teenagers don't even name a job. All of this hints that today's teenagers aren't thinking enough about their future plans – and, fair or not, this lack of career preparation will likely have lifelong consequences. Note: The headline on this piece has been updated. Previous headline: Why 25% of teens can't answer this question Sources and further reading: This OECD report argues that the narrowing answers to this question hint that teens are confused about their future careers: 🤍 Here's the data from the PISA survey: 🤍 It's difficult to work with, but the codebook provides broad summaries of the data: 🤍 This study shows that students with science-related ambitions are far more likely to get science or engineering degrees, even if they aren’t as good at math: 🤍 This paper looks at the long term ramifications of being “misaligned” as a teenager: 🤍 If you’re a solutions-oriented person, this OECD report is about what we can do to help teenagers better think about their professional futures: 🤍 Vox is an explanatory newsroom on a mission to help everyone understand our weird, wonderful, complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. Part of that mission is keeping our work free. You can help us do that by making a gift: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍 Check out our articles: 🤍 Listen to our podcasts: 🤍
And why the US and China are fighting over silicon in the first place. Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 In October 2022, the Biden administration placed a large-scale ban on the sale of advanced semiconductor chips to China. They also implemented a series of other rules that prevents China from making these chips on their own. These chips are used in everyday technology, like our mobile phones and computers. They’re also crucial to military and intelligence systems, which is one of the main reasons they're at the center of a feud between the United States and China. Microchips were first invented in the US in the 1950s, after which their use rapidly expanded worldwide. Since then, the supply chain for these chips has grown and spread to include countries in Europe and Asia. And while some countries have caught up to the US's edge in making these advanced chips, China still falls far behind despite multiple attempts to gain an advantage. Watch the latest episode of Vox Atlas to understand why China is losing a new cold war with the US over microchips. Sources and further reading: We found this book written by Chris Miller very helpful for understanding the history of chip development in the US and the foreign policy behind its competition and feud with China: Chip War: The Fight for the World's Most Critical Technology 🤍 This book gave us great context on China’s efforts to acquire foreign technology: Chinese Industrial Espionage by Anna Puglisi 🤍 Articles like this by Chien-Huei Wu helped us learn more about how much the US replies on east asian countries for successful technology: 🤍 Reporting by Bloomberg helped us understand major IP theft cases related to semiconductor chips: 🤍 An excellent report for more detail: Gregory Allen, CSIS 🤍 Make sure you never miss behind the scenes content in the Vox Video newsletter, sign up here: 🤍 Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out 🤍 Support Vox's reporting with a one-time or recurring contribution: 🤍 Shop the Vox merch store: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on Facebook: 🤍 Follow Vox on Twitter: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍
The Palestinian catastrophe, explained. Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 Around the time that Israelis celebrate Independence Day, Palestinians commemorate “The Nakba,” or “The Catastrophe.” The Nakba was a series of events, centered around 1948, that expelled hundreds of thousands Palestinians from their homeland and killed thousands. The Nakba isn’t the beginning of the story, but it’s a key part of Palestinian history — and the root of Israel’s creation. Prior to the Nakba, Palestine had a thriving population — largely made up of Arabs — that had lived and worked the land for centuries. But with the founding of Zionism, years of British meddling, and a British pledge to help create a Jewish state in Palestine — things began to change drastically. By 1947, with increasing tensions between Jewish settlers and Palestinian Arabs — the British left Palestine, and the UN stepped in with a plan to partition the land into two states. What followed was known as Plan Dalet: operations by Israeli paramilitary groups that violently uprooted Palestinians. An estimated 15,000 Palestinians were killed, more than 500 villages were decimated, and roughly 750,000 Palestinians displaced. Most who were expelled from their homes couldn’t return to historic Palestine. And today, millions of their descendants live in refugee camps in Gaza, the West Bank and surrounding countries. The history of the Nakba has been deliberately concealed and often ignored in western narratives around the creation of Israel. In this episode of Missing Chapter, we break down how the Nakba happened — and how it defined the future of Palestine. Sources: Check out the documentary “1948: Creation & Catastrophe” by Ahlam Muhtaseb and Andy Trimlett for more information about the events around the Nakba - 🤍 All That Remains: The Palestinian Villages Occupied and Depopulated by Israel in 1948 was a great resource in helping us understand the Nakba - 🤍 For our maps, we relied heavily on these organizations: Palestinian Academic Society for the Study of International Affairs, Institute for Middle Eastern Understanding, Palestine Remembered and Zochrot 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 This report by Ilan Pappe helped us understand how Zionist forces planned to destroy villages - 🤍 For our population breakdowns, we mainly used Australian National University’s Palestine Census reports archive - 🤍 Make sure you never miss behind the scenes content in the Vox Video newsletter, sign up here: 🤍 Vox is an explanatory newsroom on a mission to help everyone understand our weird, wonderful, complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. Part of that mission is keeping our work free. You can help us do that by making a gift: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍 Check out our articles: 🤍 Listen to our podcasts: 🤍
It's not you — the dialogue in TV and movies has gotten harder to hear. Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 Have you ever been watching a show or movie, and then a character delivers a line so unintelligible you have to scramble to find the remote and rewind? For me, this moment came during the climax of the Pete Davidson film “The King of Staten Island,” where his most important line was impossible to understand. I had to rewind three times — and eventually put subtitles on — to finally pick up what he was saying. This experience isn’t unique — gather enough people together and you can generally separate them into two categories: People who use subtitles, and people who don’t. And according to a not-so-scientific YouTube poll we ran on our Community tab, the latter category is an endangered species — 57% of you said you always use subtitles, while just 12% of you said you generally don’t. But why do so many of us feel that we need subtitles to understand the dialogue in the things we watch? The answer to that question is complex – and we get straight to the bottom of it in this explainer, with the help of dialogue editor Austin Olivia Kendrick. Make sure you never miss behind-the-scenes content in the Vox Video newsletter, sign up here: 🤍 Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out 🤍 Support Vox's reporting with a one-time or recurring contribution: 🤍 Shop the Vox merch store: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on Facebook: 🤍 Follow Vox on Twitter: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍
They went from solely distributing uncut indie gems to getting everything they made everywhere all at once Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 When you think back on your favorite movies, you might think about their famous directors or actors. But recently, a new name has become synonymous with indie film culture and appeal, and it’s not an individual, but a studio. You have to admit, their logo is pretty cool. A24 swept the 2022 Oscars. They’ve made some of the most distinct and interesting movies and TV shows of the past 10 years. But most importantly, they’ve garnered a reputation for quality — and their brand loyalty so strong that hipster film bros everywhere are wearing A24 t-shirts and caps right now. But unlike Universal or Paramount, studios that have been around for over a century, A24 has done this in just over a decade. How did this independent film distributor transform into a major player in the entertainment industry in such a short time? In this Vox Video, Nate Jones (senior writer at Vulture, and A24 obsessor) breaks down their history, and stratospheric rise to the top. Read more of Nate's writing on Vulture: 🤍 🤍 Check out more from A24: 🤍 🤍 Make sure you never miss behind the scenes content in the Vox Video newsletter, sign up here: 🤍 Vox is an explanatory newsroom on a mission to help everyone understand our weird, wonderful, complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. Part of that mission is keeping our work free. You can help us do that by making a gift: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍 Check out our articles: 🤍 Listen to our podcasts: 🤍
Concrete emits a ton of carbon. Here's how we get it to net-zero. Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 Cement accounts for 8 percent of our global carbon emissions. It’s also an incredibly difficult material to do without: It’s the glue that holds together the rock, sand, and water in concrete. And concrete is the building block of the world: It’s in our buildings, our streets, our sidewalks, and our infrastructure. Aside from water, there’s no material on earth we use more of. In order to get to net-zero CO2 emissions by 2050, we’ll have to address how we build and how we make cement. Because cement production is so closely linked to urbanization and development, China accounts for a vast majority of today’s cement-related emissions. Other countries with more development in their future will need to emit more emissions to produce cement, too. All that means the whole world needs to figure out how to create cement without the emissions. This video goes into the steps developed by researchers for how to get there. Note: The headline on this piece has been updated. Previous headline: Why cement is so bad for the climate Further reading: Here is a link to the Nature article that we based our key visual on. Two of the co-authors, Paul Fennell and Chris Bataille, appear in the video: 🤍 I interviewed Brian Potter, who wrote this great article on how much concrete we consume: 🤍 Hannah Ritchie from Our World in Data wrote a great Substack clarifying the data on China’s cement emissions: 🤍 Make sure you never miss behind the scenes content in the Vox Video newsletter, sign up here: 🤍 Vox is an explanatory newsroom on a mission to help everyone understand our weird, wonderful, complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. Part of that mission is keeping our work free. You can help us do that by making a gift: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍 Check out our articles: 🤍 Listen to our podcasts: 🤍
An outdated safety law may have cost hundreds of lives. Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 Ever since the Titanic sank on April 15, 1912, a major suspected culprit for the high death toll has been that there weren’t enough lifeboats on board. It’s a decision that's been dramatized as hubris on the part of the White Star Line — but the ship actually surpassed safety standards for the time. The Merchant Shipping Act of 1894 required the largest-class ships, those weighing over 10,000 tons, to carry at least 16 lifeboats. Even though the Titanic, which launched in 1911, weighed 45,000 tons, that minimum was the same. The Titanic carried 20 lifeboats, with a capacity for roughly half of the people on board the night the ship sank. Until the Titanic disaster, lifeboats weren’t seen as a substitute for an entire ship. The giant liner itself, which featured 16 compartments separated by watertight bulkheads, was supposed to stay afloat even after taking on water. Then, using a brand new piece of technology — the Marconi wireless telegraph — signal for help from a nearby ship, using lifeboats to methodically ferry passengers off the sinking ship. This scenario played out perfectly just a couple years before the Titanic disaster, when a ship accidentally rammed RMS Republic in 1909. The Republic sank, but nearly everyone on board was safely ferried off. The prevailing thought at the time was that disasters at sea had become a thing of the past. When the Titanic went down, that all changed. Just two years later, the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) mandated all passenger ships carry lifeboats for everyone on board. Today, the SOLAS requirement is 125% of a ship’s capacity. Further reading: Check out Sam Halpern’s work analyzing the permissible flooding conditions on the Titanic: 🤍 Read the 1909 news articles explaining the sinking of the Republic: 🤍 Dive into a wealth of Titanic research in “On a Sea of Glass” by J. Kent Layton, Bill Wormstedt, and Tad Fitch: 🤍 Make sure you never miss behind-the-scenes content in the Vox Video newsletter, sign up here: 🤍 Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out 🤍 Support Vox's reporting with a one-time or recurring contribution: 🤍 Shop the Vox merch store: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on Facebook: 🤍 Follow Vox on Twitter: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍
Diapers, food, rent — around the world, prices are rising. So what can we do about it? Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 Right now, inflation is inescapable. At the grocery store, the gas station, and in almost every country in the world, people are playing more — way more — than they did just a couple of years ago for everything. In this video, we explore three explanations for why prices are rising, as well as different policy options for bringing them down. Further reading: Coalition of Parent and Community Organizations Accuse Procter & Gamble of Price Gouging in Letter to CEO Jon Moeller About Skyrocketing Diaper Costs: 🤍 America’s monopoly problem, in one chart: 🤍 Inflation: No evidence of a wage-price spiral: 🤍 Prices, Profits, and Power: An Analysis of 2021 Firm-Level Markups: 🤍 Inflation & Corporate Power Explained: Supply Disruptions & Corporate Power, The Groundwork Collaborative: 🤍 Make sure you never miss behind-the-scenes content in the Vox Video newsletter, sign up here: 🤍 Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out 🤍 Support Vox's reporting with a one-time or recurring contribution: 🤍 Shop the Vox merch store: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on Facebook: 🤍 Follow Vox on Twitter: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍
Why is Texas so good at changing policy for the whole US? Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 In April 2021, Texas sued the US government over immigration policy. But they didn’t sue in Texas’s state capital; or in Washington, DC; or in any of the five federal courthouses along Texas’s border with Mexico. They filed the suit in a small Texas city called Victoria, far from any important government officials or immigration centers. And they did it there because they knew that if they did, a judge named Drew Tipton would be assigned to their case. In the time since Joe Biden has become president, Texas has sued the federal government 31 times. That’s a lot, but what’s more striking is that eight of those lawsuits have been heard by Judge Tipton specifically. The reason that’s weird is that, normally, judges are supposed to be assigned to cases randomly. But in Texas, you can choose your judge. It’s called “judge shopping” and it’s made Texas judges some of the most powerful in the country. It’s not just the state of Texas filing suits. In 2022 a private group called the Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine filed a suit demanding that the FDA take mifepristone, a widely used abortion medication approved in 2000, off the market. And they filed the suit in Amarillo, Texas, where the judge Matthew Kacsmaryk hears 100 percent of the cases. Kacsmaryk had previously been a lawyer for right-wing causes before he was a judge, and he ruled accordingly, ordering that the FDA ban mifepristone throughout the US. In the mifepristone case, the Supreme Court stepped in and paused the decision, but the fact that it got so close to being banned shows how empowered Texas federal judges are by the rules of Texas district courts. These judges, most of whom were appointed by Donald Trump, are playing a huge role in shaping national policy, and they’ve turned Texas into a powerful weapon against the federal government. Sources/further reading: The Federal Judicial Center keeps a phenomenal and really easy-to-use database of all US federal judges: 🤍 In 2022 Steve Vladeck filed an amicus brief to the Supreme Court that outlines the issue of judge shopping really clearly: 🤍 This 2018 article by Alex Botoman dives into the issue of random case assignment and was an invaluable resource in understanding how federal district courts around the country assign cases, with or without the use of divisions: 🤍 Steve also writes a Substack about law and the Supreme Court, and in March wrote a great post about single-judge divisions: 🤍 And Steve's book about the Supreme Court comes out on May 16, 2023: 🤍 Make sure you never miss behind-the-scenes content in the Vox Video newsletter, sign up here: 🤍 Vox is an explanatory newsroom on a mission to help everyone understand our weird, wonderful, complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. Part of that mission is keeping our work free. You can help us do that by making a gift: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍 Check out our articles: 🤍 Listen to our podcasts: 🤍
Inside the Wagner Group’s playbook. Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 On January 10, 2023, the Ukrainian town of Soledar was reportedly captured. But it wasn’t captured by the Russian army under Vladimir Putin’s command. The announcement came from a relatively unknown man, Yevgeny Prigozhin, who said his troops now controlled the town. The troops are part of the Wagner Group, a private army that has become a prominent force alongside Russian troops in the war against Ukraine. But they aren’t new. They've been secretly fighting for Russia around the world since 2014. In this video, we take a look at their playbook and examine the three main steps they use to spread Russian influence around the world in brutal ways. We also look at how they’ve transformed from a ghost army to a recognizable private military group with insignias and an online brand, changing the nature of this secret group and its role in the world. Sources and further reading: Candace Rondeaux’s detailed report about the Wagner Group can be found here: 🤍 For a summary of Syria’s ongoing conflict, we recommed this brief overview by CFR: 🤍 If you’d like to understand France’s role in Mali in more depth, check out this Q&A by CSIS: 🤍 And to get a more detailed understanding of Wagner’s arrival in Mali, including additional satellite imagery, check out this CSIS investigation: 🤍 For a more in-depth look at the mass grave linked to Wagner Groups in Mali, you can read and watch France 24’s coverage here: 🤍 This UN report (in French) provides an overview of the human impact the conflict and the Wagner Group have had on civilians in Mali: 🤍 You can find the full transcript of the 2017 meeting between Russian president Vladimir Putin and then-president of Sudan Omar Al-Bashar here: 🤍 This investigation by OCCPR reveals the links between Wagner’s gold mining ties and Sudanese military companies in detail: 🤍 To understand how the Wagner Group brands itself and shows up online and around the world, we checked Prigozhin’s telegram account here: 🤍 And Reverse Side of the Medal, the Wagner Group’s unofficial telegram account: 🤍 Make sure you never miss behind-the-scenes content in the Vox Video newsletter, sign up here: 🤍 Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out 🤍 Support Vox's reporting with a one-time or recurring contribution: 🤍 Shop the Vox merch store: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on Facebook: 🤍 Follow Vox on Twitter: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍
Solar geoengineering might help lower temps, but it’s a controversial approach. Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 The climate change crisis has become so dire that we’re being forced not only to think of ways to curb emissions and mitigate greenhouse gases, but of ways to adapt to our current situation to buy ourselves more time. One of those technologies is called solar geoengineering. It happens in nature when huge volcanic eruptions cover the stratosphere with ash: That ash forms a layer that reflects sunlight and cools the planet underneath. Solar geoengineering takes advantage of that principle, using different scientific methods to make the planet more reflective overall. The problem is, deploying it would require messing with our very complicated climate on a massive scale, and many scientists don’t think the risks are worth it. To get an in-depth look at the pros and cons of solar geoengineering, we interviewed a slew of experts on both sides of the issue. Watch our explainer to decide where you stand. Sources and further reading: To explore our global CO2 emissions, take a look at Our World in Data’s charts: 🤍 The open letter for an international non-solar geoengineering agreement signed by 400 scientists, including Professor Raymond Pierrehumbert, can be found here: 🤍 The open letter supporting further research into solar geoengineering signed by 110 scientists, including Professors David Keith and Sarah Doherty, can be found here: 🤍 Read the Sami Council’s letter calling to shut down Harvard’s SCoPEx project, which Professor David Keith is affiliated, with here: 🤍 Check out the study we quote in the video about an increase in deaths related to extreme weather: 🤍 To dig into the global effects of Mount Pinatubo’s eruption, check out NASA’s research: 🤍 To learn more about Mexico’s ban on solar geoengineering and the stunt that led to this decision, check out this article by The Verge: 🤍 And to learn more about the US solar geoengineering research plan, check out this MIT Technology Review article: 🤍 Make sure you never miss behind the scenes content in the Vox Video newsletter, sign up here: 🤍 Vox is an explanatory newsroom on a mission to help everyone understand our weird, wonderful, complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. Part of that mission is keeping our work free. You can help us do that by making a gift: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍 Check out our articles: 🤍 Listen to our podcasts: 🤍
This diabetes drug could be the future of weight management. Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 Ozempic, a medication developed to manage type 2 diabetes, has been in the news a lot lately because of one of its signature side effects: drastic weight loss. Both Ozempic and Wegovy, Ozempic’s counterpart approved specifically for weight loss by the FDA, are brand names of a drug called semaglutide. Semaglutide is one of several drugs that mimics a crucial digestive hormone called glucagon-like peptide 1, or GLP-1. It amplifies a process our bodies perform naturally. GLP-1 is released in our intestines when we eat, and there are receptors for the hormone in cells all over the body. In the pancreas, GLP-1 promotes the production of insulin and suppresses the production of glucagon. This helps insulin-resistant bodies, like those with type 2 diabetes or obesity, manage blood sugar levels. In the stomach, GLP-1 slows gastric emptying, extending the feeling of being full. In the brain, GLP-1 suppresses appetite, which also promotes satiety and curbs hunger, so we eat less. In late 2022, a rush to use Ozempic off-label for weight loss, likely prompted by its sudden rise in popularity in social media, led to a shortage of the drug for people who need it. But more drugs like semaglutide are currently in the process of being approved by the FDA to be prescribed for weight loss, likely signaling an end to the shortage and a promising new generation of medical treatment of obesity. Further reading: Mila Clarke's YouTube channel: 🤍 The New Obesity Breakthrough Drugs, by Eric Topol 🤍 The Discovery and Development of Liraglutide and Semaglutide, by Lotte Bjerre Knudsen and Jesper Lau 🤍 The pregnancy risks of Ozempic and Wegovy need more attention, Julia Belluz writes for Vox. Read more here: 🤍 Note: The headline on this piece has been updated. Previous headline: The game-changing weight loss drug, explained Make sure you never miss behind-the-scenes content in the Vox Video newsletter, sign up here: 🤍 Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out 🤍 Support Vox's reporting with a one-time or recurring contribution: 🤍 Shop the Vox merch store: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on Facebook: 🤍 Follow Vox on Twitter: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍
El secretario general del GP VOX, José María Figaredo, ha acusado al Gobierno de "no aplicar ninguna medida que vaya a ayudar a España", sino "medidas coyunturales y propagandísticas". Para Figaredo, se trata de "un real decreto ley que es absurdo", ya que "hablan de la sequía pero no hablan nada de las infraestructuras hídricas". Así lo ha expresado durante el debate y votación del Real Decreto-ley 4/2023, de 11 de mayo, por el que se adoptan medidas urgentes en materia agraria y de aguas en respuesta a la sequía y al agravamiento de las condiciones del sector primario derivado del conflicto bélico en Ucrania y de las condiciones climatológicas, así como de promoción del uso del transporte público colectivo terrestre por parte de los jóvenes y prevención de riesgos laborales en episodios de elevadas temperaturas, celebrado este miércoles en la comisión permanente del Congreso.
Cairo isn’t the problem. Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 In 2017, Egypt’s government announced it would build a new capital city 45 kilometers outside of Cairo, the current capital. It was a shocking announcement since Cairo, a city of more than 10,000,000 people, has been the capital of Egypt for decades. The government claims that Cairo has become too overcrowded and that moving the capital will give both Cairo’s residents and government workers more space. But this excuse is not new. For decades, Egypt’s rulers have been building brand new cities in the desert. None of them have solved Cairo’s density issue. And based on how construction is going, this new capital won’t be a solution either. So why does Egypt want a new capital? Well, it has a lot to do with the political revolution in 2011. Watch this episode of Vox Atlas to understand the real reason behind Egypt’s giant new capital city. Sources: Mohamed Elshahed’s extensive expertise on architectural history and urbanism helped us understand why creating new cities and communities doesn’t actually improve livelihoods in Cairo: Nasr City was once Egypt’s new capital, but things went wrong: 🤍 Revolutionary Modernism? Architecture and the Politics of Transition in Egypt 1936-1967: 🤍 For historical maps of Cairo, we mainly relied on these three books: Understanding Cairo: The Logic of a City Out of Control by David Sims 🤍 Egypt’s Desert Dreams: Development or Disaster by David Sims 🤍 Cairo by André Raymond 🤍 We used this report by LSE cities to compare densities between major cities at 1:52: 🤍 For the map at 5:05, we used an updated informal cities map created by Ahmed Zaazaa, a researcher and urban designer. For the demolitions and displacement locations, we used press clippings from Egypt Today and maps from the Cairo 2050 plan. Not all locations are shown. 🤍 🤍 These three links helped us create the diagram at 6:42 that shows the population target gaps in Greater Cairo’s new cities: The Built Environment Observatory: 🤍 City Population: 🤍 Egypt census data: 🤍 These two pieces helped guide the direction of our video: The Sinister Side of Sisi’s Urban Development by Maged Mandour 🤍 Why is Egypt building a new capital by Mustafa Menshaway 🤍 And a special thanks to the many others based in Cairo who helped us research for this video. Unfortunately, their names could not be listed due to safety concerns. Make sure you never miss behind-the-scenes content in the Vox Video newsletter, sign up here: 🤍 Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out 🤍 Support Vox's reporting with a one-time or recurring contribution: 🤍 Shop the Vox merch store: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on Facebook: 🤍 Follow Vox on Twitter: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍
Julio Ariza explica en Dando Caña cómo tendría que sumar la derecha en base a la actual ley d'Hont por la que se rige nuestro sistema de cálculo. El PP, de no conseguir la mayoría absoluta, tendría que necesitar los votos de VOX para poder despedir a Pedro Sánchez de la Moncloa. En este caso, la formación de Santiago Abascal tendría que ser el tercer partido más votado. ✔ Para ver todos los programas completos haz clic aquí: 🤍 ✔ SUSCRÍBETE a nuestro canal 👉🏼❗️ ✔ Si quieres conocer TODA VERDAD SOBRE LA ACTUALIDAD visita nuestra web 🤍
【StreamLabs Donations】 🤍 【Hashtags】 General - #VoxAkuma LIVE - #VoxPopuLIVE Art - #Akurylic NSFW - #Akumasutra Memes - #AkumaMatata Fans - #Kindred GROUP: #Luxiem 【Credits】 Logo by 🤍 Overlay by 🤍 Controller by 🤍 Intro BGM - The Glory of Combat by Julian Surma Gaming chair by 🤍 Emotes by 🤍 ⚠️CHAT RULES⚠️ Simplified CN: 🤍 Traditional CN: 🤍 JP: 🤍 Welcome to the clan! We do things differently here so please read these rules carefully. These show not only how to behave on stream, but should serve as a guideline for if you wish to call yourself kindred. STREAM ETIQUETTE A. Please keep chat relevant to the stream and do not spam, troll or discuss controversial or offensive topics. B. Do not mention another streamer unless I bring them up first, nor should you mention me in any other chat unless I am mentioned first. C. All languages are welcome here, and you will be timed out if you ask people to stop talking in a certain language. D. Absolutely no spoilers or backseating unless directly asked for. E. Do not trauma dump in any way. If you use a supa to do so it will be deleted and I will ignore it. If you are struggling, please seek professional help or call someone, help is available, and you aren't alone; 🤍 F. Use emotes in chat as often as you like, but keep a limit of three per message. G. If you’d like to send supas, please use either your own currency, or, if you can’t, use one that is of similar value. Supas that misuse of another country's currency will be ignored, unless they are from Kindred who come from that country. RESPECT When engaging in other parts of the internet, respect those spaces and, if presenting as a kindred, do so with the politeness and kindness you would show other kindred. No matter how much you love being a kindred or love me, never use your passion for this community as an excuse to flame or attack others. If you do so, I do not want your support. You’re also welcome to ship me with anyone you like (with their permission of course) but please remember that your ship is only a fantasy and not to let it influence your world-view. RESPONSIBILITY You are welcome (even encouraged) to treat these streams as a source of warmth, happiness and community. If you associate these feelings with me and develop an attachment, that’s okay too. However, if you become too attached to the degree that it becomes unhealthy or parasocial, I trust you to seek help and to find happiness elsewhere. If you can do this, it will not offend me and I will be proud of you. You’re welcome back anytime as long as your engagement is done so with regards to your health. ACCOUNTABILITY Learn the difference between criticism and hate. Ignore hate, and if it’s in our chat, we’ll remove it. Honest criticism however is welcome and I trust all kindred to listen to criticism and assess it fairly. There is NEVER an excuse to bicker, fight or become defensive when someone wants to help. However, if you’d like to give criticism, please save it for YouTube comments after stream. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⏰【Luxiem】 【Vox Akuma ヴォックス・アクマ】 🤍 🤍 【Mysta Rias】 🤍 🤍 【Ike Eveland】 🤍 🤍 【Shu Yamino】 🤍 🤍 【Luca Kaneshiro】 🤍 🤍 ■ For more information, visit: ・ NIJISANJI Official YouTube (EN): 🤍 ・ NIJISANJI Official Twitch: 🤍 ・ NIJISANJI Official Twitter (English account): 🤍 ・ANYCOLOR Official Website: 🤍 ・ NIJISANJI Official Reddit: 🤍 ・ NIJISANJI Official Instagram: 🤍 ・ NIJISANJI Official Tiktok: 🤍 ・ NIJISANJI Official Facebook (English account): 🤍 ・ NIJISANJI Official YouTube (JP): 🤍 ▽ Guidance for minors 🤍 ▽ For Business and PR Inquiries 🤍
America grew from a colony to a superpower in 200 years. Help us make more ambitious videos by joining the Vox Video Lab. It gets you exclusive perks, like livestream Q&As with all the Vox creators, a badge that levels up over time, and video extras bringing you closer to our work! Learn more at 🤍 2:07 Correction: Cuba seceded from the US in 1902. With over 800 military bases around the globe, the US is easily the most powerful nation on earth. But it wasn't always this way. The US once played an insignificant role in global affairs. In this 8-minute video, you can see the transformation. Military budget data: 🤍 US foreign bases based on David Vine's book, "Base Nation" 🤍 Troop numbers: "Total Military Personnel and Dependent End Strength By Service, Regional Area, and Country". Defense Manpower Data Center. November 7, 2016. Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out 🤍 Check out our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on Twitter: 🤍 Or on Facebook: 🤍
Jennifer Wright explains how the color pink became associated with girls. Racked article: 🤍 Subscribe to our channel! 🤍 Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out 🤍 to get up to speed on everything from Kurdistan to the Kim Kardashian app. Check out our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on Twitter: 🤍 Or on Facebook: 🤍
British colonizers created a massive canal system in Pakistan — and helped cause the country’s deadly water crisis. Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 In late summer of 2022, Pakistan experienced a devastating flooding event. An unusually severe monsoon season induced by climate change resulted in a third of the country being covered with water. Over 1,600 lives were lost, and water took months to drain out of lower-lying regions of the country, causing disease and displacement. On the flip side, Pakistan is among the most water-scarce countries in the world — expected to reach absolute water scarcity by 2025 if nothing changes. You can’t remove climate change from this equation, but an overlooked factor is the role that British engineering played in building water infrastructure along the Indus River and its tributaries, Pakistan’s sole source of surface water. A series of perennial canals, dam-like structures called barrages, and embankments were built to extract as much water from the Indus as possible and convert much of Pakistan’s arid landscape into farmland. But this water infrastructure exacerbates the destruction of flooding events and creates a hierarchical system along the canals in terms of water access. In our video, we explain the design of this water infrastructure and how Pakistan’s colonial past has made the country’s relationship with water even more precarious. Daanish Mustafa, who we interviewed for this video, co-authored a report on Pakistan’s water crisis: 🤍 We recommend The Juggernaut’s reporting on the legacy of dams in Pakistan: 🤍 For more context on how Pakistan bears the brunt of the effects of climate change: 🤍 We interview David Gilmartin for this story, who authored a book on the history of water engineering in the Indus basin: 🤍 Make sure you never miss behind the scenes content in the Vox Video newsletter, sign up here: 🤍 Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out 🤍 Support Vox's reporting with a one-time or recurring contribution: 🤍 Shop the Vox merch store: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on Facebook: 🤍 Follow Vox on Twitter: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍
«Llevan en el cargo desde 2018 y el Ministerio de Agricultura ha sido incapaz de sacar ninguna ley relevante que ataje los problemas de nuestro sector primario». Así ha comenzado su intervención el diputado de Vox, José María Figaredo, en la Diputación Permanente del Congreso de los Diputados. Vídeo: Congreso de los Diputados 📺 Suscríbete a EL DEBATE en Youtube: 🤍 🎥 Todos los vídeos de EL DEBATE: 🤍 🐤 Twitter: 🤍 📸 Instagram: 🤍 📲 Facebook: 🤍 📣 Telegram: 🤍 💻 Visita 🤍
Si quieres más vídeos de OKDIARIO, este es el enlace: 🤍Okdiariovideos Visita OKDIARIO ➡️ 🤍 Más vídeos de OKDIARIO en Youtube: 🤍 Síguenos en Telegram: 🤍 Síguenos en Instagram: 🤍 Twitter: 🤍 Facebook: 🤍 TikTok: 🤍
En directo, rueda de prensa de Santiago Abascal en la sede nacional de VOX para comentar la actualidad política tras las #elecciones del #28M y tras el anuncio de las elecciones generales del #23J
Desde el Gobierno catalán se temen un gobierno de centro-derecha en España. #LibertadDigital #Noticias #pp #vox #cataluña 🔔Suscríbete al canal oficial de Libertad Digital en YouTube : 🤍 📲 Visita nuestra web: 🤍 👥Y síguenos en nuestras redes sociales Facebook: 🤍 Twitter: 🤍 Instagram: 🤍
Official video for Vidya Vox's 2016 single "Be Free" and Malayalam folk song "Pallivaalu Bhadravattakam", by Vandana Iyer from Kuthu Fire EP: 🤍 | Subscribe: 🤍 Watch next, "Look At The Lights": 🤍 Hey guys! I was in Kerala during Christmas and got to shoot this video with my sister Vandana. We grew up learning music together but don't get to sing together as much these days, so this was such a lovely opportunity. "Pallivalu Bhadravattakam" is a folk song from Kerala and this song's vibe inspired Shankar and I to write our own original lyrics and English tune. So many amazing people were part of this video! Check out all their links below! Huge shoutout to Shiji Ulleri for helping shoot the video and coming all the way from Abu Dhabi. Thanks to fam Shankar Tucker for the music production, videography and editing - as usual, it's kickass. And thanks to Jomy George for playing the chanda and coordinating everything in Cochin! So many people helped out with the video, and I'm so thankful to each and everyone of you! THANK YOU! Follow Vidya Vox: Facebook: 🤍 Twitter: 🤍 Instagram: 🤍 SnapChat: 🤍 Website: 🤍 Follow Vandana Iyer: YouTube: 🤍 Instagram: 🤍 Watch More Vidya Vox: Popular Videos: 🤍 Mashups: 🤍 Originals: 🤍 Collabs: 🤍 Listen To Vidya Vox On: Spotify: 🤍 iTunes: 🤍 Google Play: 🤍 Amazon mp3: 🤍 Video Credits: Videography by: Shankar Tucker & Shiji Ulleri (FB:🤍 site: 🤍) Drone: Shan Alpy Editing: Shankar Tucker Set Production by: Jayshankar Janardhanan & Shannu Karikkal - thank you for running around for weeks beforehand! Dancers: You guys rock! Bharatnatyam: Sreenidhi & Sreedevi | FB: 🤍 Chattambees: Ranjini TH (Choreographer), Ashitha Das, Lakshmy Velayudhan, Athira Kochaniyan, Anjali Rose, & Aparna Nandakumar (Chattambeez D3) | FB: 🤍 Costume: Gori Shardh Dancer's Makeup: Kala Shasthri & Sudheer Shastri Thank you to the graceful Kathakali dancer and the groovy chenda melam! My Wardrobe: In collaboration with the lovely ladies at Studio East6! Site: 🤍 Business Inquiries: Bookings: contact🤍vidyavox.com
There's a special kind of fat that kids have more of. Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 55 degrees in the summer feels colder than 55 degrees in the winter. And 55 degrees as an adult likely feels colder than 55 degrees as a kid. But it’s not just a feeling. It all has to do with how our bodies use fat — specifically brown fat, a lesser-known type of fat that can produce roughly 300 times more heat than any other tissue in the body. Brown fat isn’t the type of fat that adds to our weight (that’s white fat). Brown fat has the sole purpose of being burnt for heating the body, and it’s extremely effective at that. It only appears in specific parts of the body: around the neck, spine, heart, and kidneys. (It clumps around major blood vessels, in order to warm the blood as it passes through the body.) But brown fat is temporary and can adapt to pressure in a similar way to muscles. Check out the latest Vox video to learn more! Note: The headline on this piece has been updated. Previous headline: Why you get colder as you get older Make sure you never miss behind the scenes content in the Vox Video newsletter, sign up here: 🤍 Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out 🤍 Support Vox's reporting with a one-time or recurring contribution: 🤍 Shop the Vox merch store: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on Facebook: 🤍 Follow Vox on Twitter: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍
Cheap solar is a policy success story. Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 Since 2009, the price of solar energy has come down by 90 percent. That’s no accident. It’s the result of policy interventions from the US to Germany to China. As policy analyst Gregory Nemet puts it, “No one country is responsible. It was a relay race rather than a competition.” The global flow of knowledge, people, technology, and policy helped bring down the price per watt from more than $100 in 1976 to less than $0.50 today, according to this analysis from the folks at Our World in Data. 🤍 If we can learn the right lessons from solar’s success, it could help us develop and deploy the technology we need to keep our planet habitable and avoid the worst impacts of climate change. Make sure you never miss behind-the-scenes content in the Vox Video newsletter, sign up here: 🤍 Vox is an explanatory newsroom on a mission to help everyone understand our weird, wonderful, complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. Part of that mission is keeping our work free. You can help us do that by making a gift: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍 Check out our articles: 🤍 Listen to our podcasts: 🤍
The four criminal investigations into the former president, explained Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 Donald Trump is now the first former US President to face criminal charges. He pleaded not guilty to 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree. This case involves hush money that Trump’s lawyer paid to an alleged former sexual partner. But it’s actually just one of four criminal investigations into the former president. The other three investigations focus on his behavior after the 2020 presidential election. A Georgia team is examining Trump’s efforts to persuade Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to “find” more Trump votes after the votes had been counted and Raffensperger had declared Joe Biden the winner. Federal special prosecutor Jack Smith is heading up the other two investigations. One group is looking at the Trump team’s attempts to persuade officials in a handful of states where Biden won not to certify his victory, and instead to claim Trump won the state despite the vote counts. The other federal investigation is focused on classified documents that Trump brought with him from the White House to his Florida estate after losing the 2020 election. According to reports from the Washington Post and the New York Times, when the FBI searched his estate in August 2022, they found documents related to nuclear weapons, as well as files containing information that could put US informants in the field in danger. As president, Trump didn’t just say outrageous things, he acted in unprecedented ways. Now that he’s out of office, investigators in a variety of jurisdictions are trying to figure out if he broke the law, too. Make sure you never miss behind the scenes content in the Vox Video newsletter, sign up here: 🤍 Vox is an explanatory newsroom on a mission to help everyone understand our weird, wonderful, complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. Part of that mission is keeping our work free. You can help us do that by making a gift: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍 Check out our articles: 🤍 Listen to our podcasts: 🤍
One of the biggest F1 races in the world also has the shortest circuit. Subscribe to our channel and turn on notifications (🔔) so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 Vox is an explanatory newsroom on a mission to help everyone understand our weird, wonderful, complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. Part of that mission is keeping our work free. You can help us do that by making a gift: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍 Check out our articles: 🤍 Listen to our podcasts: 🤍
How dyslexia is a differently organized brain. Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 The brain isn’t naturally wired to read. It’s a task that requires explicit instruction for our brains to activate different areas, including those that control vision, sound, and meaning. For fluent readers, the result is a complicated reading circuit — connected by neural pathways of white matter — to allow us to process words within milliseconds. But this reading circuit looks different for people with dyslexia. For decades, the research was largely focused on how this different brain organization often resulted in delays and difficulty in areas like reading, spelling, and grammar. And today, there continues to be stigma and misconceptions around a dyslexia diagnosis. But the challenges of dyslexia often overshadow another part of the picture. Research has repeatedly shown dyslexia is also associated with specific cognitive strengths. These include visuo-spatial processing, narrative memory, problem-solving, and reasoning. While there is still a lot to learn about these advantages and how they work, in the piece above we unpack what we know about dyslexia, and what many studies have concluded about these strengths. This perspective could be critical — not just for the roughly 20 percent of people who have dyslexia — but for the colleagues, peers, and educators who can better empower dyslexic thinking and better understand neurodiversity. SOURCES: On the reading brain: Proust and the Squid: 🤍 Studies: “Explorative bias”: 🤍 Impossible figures: 🤍 // 🤍 Peripheral vision: 🤍 // 🤍 Blurred images: 🤍 ADDITIONAL READING: The Dyslexic Advantage: 🤍 Amazing Dyslexics: 🤍 Overcoming Dyslexia: 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 Note: The headline on this piece has been updated. Previous headline: The benefits of dyslexic thinking Make sure you never miss behind-the-scenes content in the Vox Video newsletter, sign up here: 🤍 Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out 🤍 Support Vox's reporting with a one-time or recurring contribution: 🤍 Shop the Vox merch store: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on Facebook: 🤍 Follow Vox on Twitter: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍
And how the US influences which weapons they get, and which ones they don't. Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 When Russia first invaded Ukraine in 2014, the US was hesitant to send more than supplies to the Ukrainian army. But when Russia launched a full-scale invasion in 2022, the US changed its tune. President Joe Biden quickly began approving huge packages of weapons to help Ukraine stymie the Russian attack. And for the first couple of weeks, it worked. The Ukrainian army used weapons from the US and its Western allies to stop Russia from capturing Kiev. As the war progressed, so did US help. It sent heavy artillery in the spring, and then agreed to eventually send tanks in winter 2023. But each time, it deliberated over whether Ukraine can effectively use the weapons, and whether they'll provoke Russia to escalate the conflict. So far, that hasn’t happened, and the US and its allies are now considering sending Ukraine very advanced long-range missiles and F-16 fighter jets. Both would be game-changers for Ukraine. Sources and further reading: Stimson Center- 🤍stimson.org/2022/u-s-security-assistance-to-ukraine-breaks-all-precedents/&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1679600857055035&usg=AOvVaw0BoV2nDHscvxIPa3G1yqoK CSIS - 🤍 Politico - 🤍 The Economist - 🤍 Note: The headline on this piece has been updated. Previous headline: How US weapons transformed the war in Ukraine, How Ukraine got so many weapons Make sure you never miss behind the scenes content in the Vox Video newsletter, sign up here: 🤍 Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out 🤍 Support Vox's reporting with a one-time or recurring contribution: 🤍 Shop the Vox merch store: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on Facebook: 🤍 Follow Vox on Twitter: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍
Entrevista al redactor de The Objective, Marcos Ondarra. Necesitamos tu ayuda si quieres que sigamos haciendo este canal. Por pequeña que sea: Número de cuenta: ES07 0081 0085 6200 0301 6410 Swift-BIC: BSABESBB Titular: Periodista Digital S.L. Concepto: Donación Paypal: 🤍 🔔 Recuerda suscríbirte a nuestro canal y activar las notificaciones Más noticias: 🤍 ➤SUSCRÍBETE a Periodista Digital en YouTube: 🤍 ✔️Síguenos en Twitter: 🤍 ✔️Síguenos en Facebook: 🤍 ✔️Síguenos en Telegram: 🤍
How two feuding countries are tearing apart the Middle East. Help us make more ambitious videos by joining the Vox Video Lab: 🤍 The Saudis and Iranians have never actually declared war on each other. Instead, they fight indirectly by supporting opposing sides in other countries and inciting conflicts. This is known as proxy warfare. And it’s had a devastating effect on the region. Countries, especially poor ones, can’t function if there are larger countries pulling strings within their borders. And that’s exactly what's happening in the Middle East. The Saudi-Iranian rivalry has become a fight over influence, and the whole region is a battlefield. Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out 🤍 Check out our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on Twitter: 🤍 Or on Facebook: 🤍
How a cheesy joke from the 1830s became the most widely spoken word in the world. Subscribe to our channel! 🤍 OK is thought to be the most widely recognized word on the planet. We use it to communicate with each other, as well as our technology. But it actually started out as a language fad in the 1830’s of abbreviating words incorrectly. Young intellectuals in Boston came up with several of these abbreviations, including “KC” for “knuff ced,” “OW” for “oll wright,” and KY for “know yuse.” But thanks to its appearance in Martin Van Buren’s 1840 presidential re-election campaign as the incumbents new nickname, Old Kinderhook, OK outlived its abbreviated comrades. Later, widespread use by early telegraph operators caused OK to go mainstream, and its original purpose as a neutral affirmative is still how we use it today. Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out 🤍. Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on Facebook: 🤍 Or Twitter: 🤍
We can’t truly switch to renewable energy without a breakthrough. Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 In the past few decades, solar and wind energy have made remarkable progress; they're now satisfying significant portions of our energy demand. But there's a problem holding us back from relying on them even more: They can’t be stored very well. Solar energy is only generated while the sun is up, and wind energy while the wind is blowing. But our power grids are designed to respond to demand whenever it occurs. Even suddenly, as is the case with storms and heat waves. When solar and wind are not available and demand spikes, the power companies need to burn fossil fuels — particularly natural gas, because it can be stored easily. If we ever want a power grid that relies solely on solar and wind energy, we’ll need to come up with ways to store them. Luckily, experts and engineers worldwide are coming up with some genius plans. Watch the video above to learn more about how we might be able to store solar and wind energy and, finally, transition away from fossil fuels. Read Neel's article energy storage here: 🤍 For more videos on climate coverage, watch our playlist: 🤍 Make sure you never miss behind-the-scenes content in the Vox Video newsletter, sign up here: 🤍 Vox is an explanatory newsroom on a mission to help everyone understand our weird, wonderful, complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. Part of that mission is keeping our work free. You can help us do that by making a gift: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍 Check out our articles: 🤍 Listen to our podcasts: 🤍
The iconic "Chinatown" look started as a survival strategy. Want to watch the long version of this video? Check it out here: 🤍 Subscribe to our channel and turn on notifications (🔔) so you don't miss any videos: 🤍 Vox is an explanatory newsroom on a mission to help everyone understand our weird, wonderful, complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. Part of that mission is keeping our work free. You can help us do that by making a gift: 🤍 Watch our full video catalog: 🤍 Follow Vox on TikTok: 🤍 Check out our articles: 🤍 Listen to our podcasts: 🤍
.svg){kind=small}
